Browsing-smartphone-at-night

Your Cell Phone Can Give You Brain Cancer

Wireless gadgets like your smartphones and LTE tablets are indispensable in today’s lifestyle but you should know that without moderation you’re paying for such convenience with your own dear life.

Depending on how often you’re using your wireless phone, you may be feeling signs of brain problems after the first ten years. Remember, you yourself may not be able to detect something nasty must be going on already ; after all, it’s your brain that is being harmed.

Before you abandon this as nothing but an alarmist notion, just read the facts.

The Human Anatomy: Nature and Origin

To have a very good technical grasp of the danger from electromagnetic microwaves emitted by your cell phone, you need to understand that the human body is not biological in nature although that’s how they brought us up in school. Biology is that branch of Science that has a difficulty of defining itself.

In its truest sense, the human body is electromagnetic in nature, just like everything else in the whole universe. It is the medium of which the whole Nature is really made of. Its inherent duality, i.e. electric and magnetic, resulted in a third force we observe as motion, a wave. Every wave propagates in space at its inherent frequency which ultimately defines its form.

An electromagnetic wave is a constantly moving medium that we call simply as energy. Energy is indestructible, but it can be transformed, or translated into another form, by itself or externally.

Space itself is the basic form in which energy is manifested. Space is not a void of nothingness but it is where or what we came from, and so is everything else.

This basic form of energy is self-organizing and self-transforming, and such is the basic character of Nature to which all things are derived from. Nature is energy and we are just one of its derivations.

To put it simply, we are nothing but a form of energy, made up of electromagnetic waves propagating in space at certain frequencies that are mere derivatives of the fundamental frequency by which Nature propagates herself, within herself.

Yes, Nature is feminine as within herself creation dominates over destruction. Otherwise, we won’t be here today. Creation is actually a transformation by the fusion and coherence of various frequencies that are in absolute harmony. What man destroys today, she restores in her time.

Our physical set of eyes, which in themselves are made of the same medium as everything else, can only detect or perceive a certain set of frequencies that would ultimately define our sense of visual reality.

Collectively, the limited bandwidth of our perceptions defines the world we live in. It is for this inherent limitation that the notion of parallel realities or parallel universes, coexisting here and now, is more than plausible.

That which we acquire as our individual consciousness is just part of a bigger consciousness that is of Nature herself.

Since we are made of electromagnetic waves of certain frequencies, anything that influences these waves may adversely affect, or enhances its normal operation. Those external wave frequencies that synchronize in harmony with our own may enhance our well-being, and those that don’t may impair it.

The Brain Waves

Neural electromagnetic waves, i.e. brain waves, can be detected using electroencephalogram [EEG], another electromagnetic device. Some of these brain waves already identified are:

  • Alpha wave [8-12Hz] – relaxed mental states
  • Beta wave [12-30Hz] – normal waking consciousness
  • Delta wave [0.5-4Hz] – deepest stages of sleep
  • Gamma wave [25-100Hz] – unity of conscious perception
  • Mu wave [9-13Hz] – diminished with movement, intent to move or observation of movement

The above “positive” frequencies are observed depending on the activity indicated. However, they have also identified “negative” frequencies that can be used, and are being used for destructive purposes, i.e. mass psychosis.

It must be understood even further, that such harmful frequencies can be hidden within useful frequencies as well, through the method known as signal amplitude modulation [AM], frequency modulation [FM] and multiplexing.

Wireless Technologies

The concept of wireless communication has enabled the establishment of the internet to which we owe so much for our unhampered education, uncensored views and opinions, and of course, social connectivity, although when overdone, may sever our connection to our immediate community and even within the household.

It has empowered the ordinary man beyond what established broadcast networks could do. But the way it has been implemented from the very beginning only suggests that we’re not off the hook as of yet.

Here’s why…

Download: IARC Classifies RadioFrequency Electromagnetic Fields as Possibly Carcinogenic to Humans

Background

Audible signal attenuate with distance, and cannot be broadcasted in raw format due to differences in people’s preference.

In order to transmit music and audio [20Hz-20kHz] to remote distances and “without disturbing the peace” in the process, the information is modulated or embedded into the radio carrier signal, preferably of much higher frequencies which we could not hear under unaided circumstance, i.e. without using radio receiver.

Portable radio receiver is tuned to the radio frequency by way of resonance. Resonance is a condition when a body offers the least resistance to an applied force.

The tuning knob of a radio receiver is configured to adjust the net resistance of the internal circuitry of a radio receiver down to its minimum for a single radio broadcast frequency, and only that frequency which you want to tuned into. The radio carrier signal is then stripped out through the succeeding circuit stages, leaving only the audio information you wish to listen to.

One radio carrier signal is allocated for every radio station and it’s easy to decipher them. KIIS-FM 102.7, for example, is broadcasting using the radio frequency of 102.7 megaHertz, at a regulated signal intensity so as not to interfere with other stations nearby.

Similar technique, but different set of frequencies, is being used with data transmission through our cellphones and computer modems. The choice and decision of which frequencies are to be used is entrusted to our government.

Government and technology

It so happens that governments do have a tendency to protect itself from the people it has sworn to serve and protect.

A derivation of the technology on resonance is the urban application of crowd control using neural audible frequencies. Imagine a siren being blown directly into your brain.

This can be achieved by using the principle of resonance in conjunction with the known brain wave frequencies outlined above.

g20-pittsburgh-lrad-first-time-1-600x534

Long Range Acoustical Device, LRAD
Long Range Acoustical Device, LRAD

That’s proof enough that we are the mercy of whoever has the control of the government. How many black budget government projects are being done out there without our oversight?

Just like we have said a while ago, destructive wave frequencies can be embedded in radio and TV broadcasts to proactively control the population. The same dark frequencies could be the one they are using in standard carrier waves emitted from their cell sites and into our smartphones.

The ability of our cellphones to broadcast their own signal to a cell site a thousand meters away should give us an idea of how powerful these electromagnetic waves are. And if your brain is right along this line of transmission, it sure is within a precarious situation when the frequency being legislated is that one which could harm it to begin with.

This, obviously, is no laughing matter, don’t you think?

The Institutional Limitations

The grandfather of wireless technology, Dr. Nikola Tesla, has warned us about the dangers of these radio frequencies more than a hundred years ago.

The problem is we don’t have the physical nor legal control on what frequencies the wireless manufacturers may use but the government. Since the government is not under our control but the Corporations that finance and nurture these politicians to begin with, we are, sad to say, at their mercy.

The telecommunications regulating body in every country is effectively under the control of the Corporations they are to regulate. They can choose whatever radio frequencies the whole communication system works with.

You should understand that the element of mass control and societal engineering are deliberately built into the system because they know exactly what the enhanced free flowing communication system could do to our mental faculties.

Worst, the frequencies by which these gadgets operate have the potential of killing us gradually through cellular and DNA manipulations, and the development of cancer.

Just like they are forcing us to use chemicals on hiding the symptoms of our disease, they are also enticing us to impress on our heads those electromagnetic frequencies that have the capability to affect the way we think, reduce our creativity, induce anxiety and a myriad of psychological stress, and most condemnable of all, sever our inherent connection to a deeper consciousness.

The only option we have right now in order to mitigate its effect is to:

  • use these wireless gadgets in moderation; use the speaker when possible;
  • install a Faraday cage or grounded metallic shielding throughout your home to divert all EM waves directly into the Earth.

Other than those mentioned above, the best long term solution really is to change the entire telecommunication system to operate on safer frequencies like the octaves of the Schumann resonance [7.83 Hz].

Heavy Cell Phone Use Can Quadruple Your Risk of Deadly Brain Cancer

January 06, 2015

By Dr. Mercola

No one wants to hear that something as “indispensable” as your cell phone might cause grave harm to your health, but that’s exactly what mounting evidence tells us we’re faced with.

Wireless phones and other gadgets have the potential to cause all sorts of health problems, from headaches to brain tumors. The link between brain cancer and cell phone use has been a particularly persistent one, and mounting research has only made this association stronger…

As mentioned in the featured video, previous research has shown that those who begin using cell phones heavily before age 20 have four to five times more brain cancer by their late 20s, compared to those whose exposure is minimal.

In 2011, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), an arm of the World Health Organization (WHO), declared cell phones a Class B Carcinogen, meaning a “possible cancer-causing agent,” based on the available research.

This places cell phones in the same category as diesel engine exhaust, some pesticides, and some heavy metals. The expert panel ruled that there was “some evidence” that regular cell phone use increased the risk of two types of tumors – brain tumors (gliomas) and acoustic neuromas.

When you consider the fact that your body is bioelectric, it’s easier to understand how and why biological damage from wireless phones might occur.1

For starters, your body uses electrons to communicate, and inside every cell are mitochondria, the “power plants” of the cell, and these mitochondria can be adversely impacted by electromagnetic fields, resulting in cellular dysfunction. Other mechanisms of harm have also been discovered in recent years.

Wireless Phone Use Increases Risk of Malignant Brain Tumor

The latest analysis,2, 3 published online ahead of print in October, was performed by Dr. Lennart Hardell, a professor of oncology at University of Örebro in Sweden, and statistician Michael Carlberg from the same University.

The pair looked at data from two previous case-controlled studies on Swedish patients diagnosed with malignant brain tumors during the periods of 1997-2003 and 2007-2009.

The patients were between the ages of 18 and 80 years old at the time of their diagnosis. Cell phone use was ascertained via questionnaires. (Use of a hands-free device counted as non-exposure.) In all, nearly 1,500 brain cancer patients were included, along with 3,530 cancer-free controls.

Using regression analysis, adjusted for gender, age, year of diagnosis, and socioeconomic index, the odds of developing a malignant and highly lethal brain cancer called glioma rose concurrently with increased cell phone use.

The more hours spent with a cell phone pressed to their ear, and the more years they’d spent using a mobile phone, the higher the odds were.

  • Those who logged the most amount of hours on their cell phones were twice as likely to develop glioma compared to those who used them the least
  • Those who used either a cell phone or cordless house phone for more than 25 years had triple the risk of glioma, compared to those who had used wireless telephones for less than one year

To put this risk ratio into some perspective, just over five people out of 100,000 were diagnosed with malignant brain cancer between 1995 and 2002. If that rate triples, the odds of developing a malignant brain tumor rise to about 16 out of 100,000.

But, there are also signs that technology is progressively getting more harmful—not less so… As noted in the featured article:4

“The case control studies covered periods during which phone technologies had changed considerably. It started with first generation analogue phones that had an output power of 1 W at about 900 MHz.

The 2nd generation GSM (Global System for Mobile Communication) phones (2G) with either 900 or 1800 MHz frequency had pulsed output power averaging tens of mW.

The 3rd generation (3G) phones UMTS (Universal Mobile Telecommunication System) are more amplitude modulated than pulsed, and typically use a broad frequency band (5 MHz width) from 700-3 590 MHz on a worldwide basis, and from 900-2 170 MHz in Europe with output power of the order of tens of μW.”

The findings show that 3G phones may cause more harm than earlier versions, raising the risk of brain cancer four-fold. It also appears to have shorter latency period—just five to 10 years, compared to about 25 years for earlier mobile phone versions.

Proposed Mechanisms of Harm

One mechanism of harm, published in 2010,5 explains how electromagnetic fields damage your cells and DNA by inducing a cellular stress response. The research was conducted by Dr. Martin Blank,6 PhD, a former Associate Professor at Columbia University in the department of physiology and cellular biophysics, and past president of the Bioelectromagnetics Society.

He gave an informative speech at the November 18, 2010 Commonwealth Club of California program, “The Health Effects of Electromagnetic Fields,” co-sponsored by ElectromagneticHealth.org.

In his lecture, Dr. Blank explained that DNA, with its “coil of coils” structure, is very vulnerable to electromagnetic fields. It possesses the same structural characteristics of a fractal antenna (electronic conduction and self-symmetry), and these two properties allow for greater reactivity of DNA to electromagnetic fields than other tissues.

Moreover, no heat is required for this DNA damage to occur. Dr. Blank believes the potential harm of wireless technologies can be significant, and that there’s plenty of peer-reviewed research to back up such suspicions.

A review of 11 long-term epidemiologic studies published in the journal Surgical Neurology7 in 2009 revealed that using a cell phone for 10 years or longer approximately doubles your risk of being diagnosed with a brain tumor on the same side of the head where the cell phone is typically held. Both Dr. Hardell and Carlberg were involved in that study as well, and these findings are very similar to the findings in their latest review, discussed earlier.

Another important study, funded by the US government, was published in JAMA8, 9 in 2011. Using a specialized brain scanner capable of detecting alterations in glucose, the researchers determined that cell phone radiation triggers your brain cells to metabolize glucose at an increased rate. Glucose metabolism equates to cell activation, so the findings indicate that radiation from your cell phone has a well-defined measureable influence on your brain. Essentially, each time you put a cell phone up to your ear, you’re artificially activating your brain cells. While that much is clear, it’s still unknown whether this excess glucose production is harmful, or can cause a cascade of problems down the line.

Common-Sense Guidelines to Protect Your and Your Family’s Health

It’s important to note that researchers are in general agreement that there’s a latency period of about 10 years or more before the damage shows up, which places children at greatest risk—a risk that is potentially exacerbated with more modern 3G technologies, which appear to be even more harmful than earlier versions.

From my perspective, the evidence clearly indicates that we need to invoke the precautionary principle with regards to cell phone use, as well as other wireless technologies. Until the industry starts taking this matter seriously, the responsibility to keep children safe falls on the parents. To minimize the risk to your brain, and that of your child, pay heed to the following advice:

    • Don’t let your child use a cell phone. Barring a life-threatening emergency, children should not use a cell phone, or a wireless device of any type. Children are far more vulnerable to cell phone radiation than adults, because of their thinner skull bones.
    • Keep your cell phone use to a minimum. Turn your cell phone off more often. Reserve it for emergencies or important matters. As long as your cell phone is on, it emits radiation intermittently, even when you are not actually making a call. Use a land line at home and at work.
    • Reduce or eliminate your use of other wireless devices. Just as with cell phones, it is important to ask yourself whether or not you really need to use them every single time. If you must use a portable home phone, use the older kind that operates at 900 MHz. They are no safer during calls, but at least some of them do not broadcast constantly even when no call is being made. Note the only way to truly be sure if there is an exposure from your cordless phone is to measure with an electrosmog meter, and it must be one that goes up to the frequency of your portable phone (so old meters won’t help much). As many portable phones are 5.8 Gigahertz, we recommend you look for RF meters that go up to 8 Gigahertz.

You can find RF meters at www.EMFSafetyStore.com. Even without an RF meter, you can be fairly certain your portable phone is problematic if the technology is labeled DECT, or digitally enhanced cordless technology. Alternatively, you can be very careful with the base station placement as that causes the bulk of the problem since it transmits signals 24/7, even when you aren’t talking. If you can keep the base station at least three rooms away from where you spend most of your time, and especially your bedroom, they may not be as damaging to your health. Ideally it would be helpful to turn off or disconnect your base station every night before you go to bed.

  • Limit cell phone use to areas with excellent reception. The weaker the reception, the more power your phone must use to transmit, and the more power it uses, the more radiation it emits, and the deeper the dangerous radio waves penetrate into your body. Ideally, you should only use your phone with full bars and good reception.
  • Avoid carrying your cell phone on your body, and do not sleep with it below your pillow or near your head. Ideally, put it in your purse or carrying bag. Placing a cell phone in your bra or in a shirt pocket over your heart is asking for trouble, as is placing it in a man’s pocket if he seeks to preserve his fertility. The most dangerous place to be, in terms of radiation exposure, is within about six inches of the emitting antenna. You do not want any part of your body within that area while the phone is on.
  • Don’t assume one cell phone is safer than another.There’s no such thing as a “safe” cell phone.
  • Respect others; many are highly sensitive to EMF. Some people who have become sensitive can feel the effects of others’ cell phones in the same room, even when it is on but not being used. If you are in a meeting, on public transportation, in a courtroom or other public places, such as a doctor’s office, keep your cell phone turned off out of consideration for the “secondhand radiation” effects. Children are also more vulnerable, so please avoid using your cell phone near children.
  • Use a well-shielded wired headset: Wired headsets will certainly allow you to keep the cell phone farther away from your body. However, if a wired headset is not well-shielded — and most of them are not — the wire itself can act as an antenna attracting and transmitting radiation directly to your brain. So make sure the wire used to transmit the signal to your ear is shielded. One of the best kinds of headsets use a combination of shielded wire and air-tube. These operate like a stethoscope, transmitting the sound to your head as an actual sound wave; although there are wires that still must be shielded, there is no wire that goes all the way up to your head.

source »

 

"I've been doing my eTherapy indefinitely for 2 hours daily... including the weekends. So far, things have been going great. Also, I've adopted intermittent fasting into my lifestyle since June 25. To date, I've lost 17 lbs and basically achieved my weight goal of 168 lbs a few weeks ago... I enjoy killing those micro-organisms. For the record, I haven't gotten sick in 2017." - W

Find more about how you can decisively defeat any known and unknown ailments, right here.

2 thoughts on “Your Cell Phone Can Give You Brain Cancer”

We do appreciate sensible comments...